Advanced climate models and faster supercomputers must
be developed to ensure that policymakers have better global and regional
predictions of future climate and its effects.
As greenhouse
gases accumulate in the atmosphere, many questions arise concerning
how fast and in what ways Earth's environment will change. For example,
in the United States, will increased emissions of carbon dioxide from
coal combustion in the 21 st century make the Southeast wetter or drier
over the next 100 years? Will changes in temperature and moisture conditions
make certain U.S. regions more vulnerable to insect-borne diseases? By the
year 2100, will the world's glaciers be largely melted and will some
low-lying coastal lands be flooded by rising sea levels?
Detailed
answers to questions like these being asked by policymakers and researchers
will require more sophisticated climate models, faster supercomputers
to run them, and larger data storage repositories that can be networked
nationwide to store and exchange large data files. The Department of
Energy's climate science mission is to improve the scientific basis
for assessing potential consequences of climate change on decade-to-century
time scales.
| |

David Erickson (left, with José Hernandez) is director of CCS's
Climate and Carbon Research Institute. He is a member of the scientific
planning team of the Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Study (SOLAS). He
co-authored a chapter on the interactive effects of ozone depletion and
climate change, which appears in the United Nations Environment Programme
document entitled Environmental Effects of Ozone Depletion and Its Interactions
with Climate Change: 2002 Assessment.
|
The goals of the Climate and Carbon Research Institute
(CCRI) at DOE's Center for Computational Sciences at ORNL are centered
on this endeavor. DOE's computer centers at ORNL and elsewhere are
making great progress in understanding future climate—a predicted average of weather patterns—under different
scenarios. Already scientists are running global warming "experiments" on
supercomputers.
Because carbon is a waste product of fossil energy combustion in power
plants and energy use by cars and trucks, DOE's primary interest
is the effect of carbon dioxide emissions on climate warming. DOE
wants researchers to represent the carbon cycle correctly in their models
to provide an objective framework for investigations of interactions
of processes and feedback involving the atmosphere, land, and oceans.
CCRI, led by David Erickson and John Drake, is coupling carbon and
climate models with the help of researchers in ORNL's Environmental
Sciences Division. Earlier under the guidance of Drake, CCS researchers
modified an important climate model so it could run on massively
parallel supercomputers. The model predicts interactions between the
atmosphere and land and between the atmosphere and oceans. CCRI has collaborated
with the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder,
Colorado, and with Los Alamos National Laboratory in modeling interactions
among processes generated by and affecting the land, atmosphere, and
oceans.
Climate modelers face difficult challenges. For example, changes
in the chemical makeup of the atmosphere can have confounding effects.
Greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide emitted from the land to the
atmosphere can absorb infrared radiation from Earth's surface
and prevent the escape of heat. However, sulfate aerosols from coal-fired
power plant emissions can have a cooling effect, moderating
the temperature signal and altering weather patterns.
DOE, which has funded research that has led to important breakthroughs
in climate modeling, is pushing researchers to make climate simulation
models more comprehensive and more detailed over the next 20 years. These
models will consume a record number of compute cycles using the fastest
computers ever built.
Climate simulation is an international research activity of importance
to policy-makers in a variety of nations. The Japanese government
has invested in climate science by building the world's largest
supercomputer dedicated to fine-scale climate simulations.
Oak Ridge and Japan
The Japan Earth Simulator, ranked number one in supercomputer power
and speed on the latest Top500 list of Jack Dongarra of the University
of Tennessee, has a theoretical computing speed of 35 to 40 teraflops,
or 35 to 40 trillion calculations per second. Significantly, the
scientific codes used on supercomputers at DOE sites such as the
CCS have made America competitive with Japan in advancing the understanding
of climate. As the agency's second priority for future facilities,
DOE's Office of Science has proposed developing and siting
a leadership-class computing capability to rival Japanese computational
abilities in climate prediction and other areas.
U.S. computing
sites also are collaborating with Japan in climate prediction. In 2001
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), relying partly
on results from global climate models run on the world's supercomputers,
concluded that "there is new and
stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years
is attributable to human activities." The IPCC projected that, by
the end of 2100, the global average temperature of the earth could
rise by 2.7 to 10.4˚F.
ORNL's CCRI has joined Japan, NCAR, and the National Energy Research
Scientific Computing (NERSC) Center in California in running
simulations to provide answers for IPCC's Fourth Assessment, due
out in 2007. The CCRI simulations require an average of 25% of the compute
hours on the IBM Power4 at CCS. The four participants are all using the
same code on scenarios with different carbon concentrations in the
atmosphere.
NERSC is
predicting the climate and its effects through 2100 assuming that the
carbon content stays the same as it is to-day—370 parts
per million (ppm). NCAR is predicting the effects of a more optimistic
scenario in which humankind finds a way to stop the buildup of atmospheric
carbon when it reaches 876 ppm by 2100.
About a half dozen researchers at CCRI, aided by 20 staff members in
CCS, have collaborated in building and optimizing the Community Climate
System Model on the IBM Power4. The scenario simulated at ORNL assumes
that humankind stabilizes atmospheric carbon concentrations at 550 ppm
by 2100 and then reverses the buildup by sequestering carbon and replacing
the fossil fuel economy with a hydrogen economy in which buildings and
transportation vehicles are powered by fuel cells and fossil power
is replaced with fission and fusion power. The IPCC runs at ORNL will
generate 30 terabytes of data. Much of the data will be retained at the
High Performance Storage System at CCS in Oak Ridge.
IPCC runs must be completed in 2004, so that the results can be analyzed
and papers can be written, peer-reviewed, and published by 2006. The
schedule will allow IPCC participants to assess the papers and prepare
a report by 2007.
Drake says that the simulation at CCS for the IPCC is the largest set
of coordinated runs he has ever seen for any project. Indeed, the
climate simulation may consume the largest amount of computing resources
ever used on a single set of codes with a single objective.
There are many questions about carbon and the climate that policymakers
would like answered. For example, is the U.S. terrestrial system in the
East taking up more carbon from
the atmosphere than it is giving off? The forest that has grown in New
England in the last century is storing carbon, but when the forest
leaves fall, considerable carbon comes out of the decaying leaves and
re-enters the atmosphere.
This and many
other questions involving interactions and feedbacks in the climate system remain
unanswered. To answer them, historical datasets must be better developed, the climate
models must be improved to make more accurate predictions about regional as well as
global climate, and the supercomputers must be faster to accommodate more data and
model calculations. The Climate and Carbon Research Institute hopes ultrascale computing
can provide the detailed answers that researchers and policymakers need.

Depiction of the amount of carbon flux between the oceans and the atmosphere (peak heights) and amount of biological activity (color). |
|